去年11月，德州2021十大正规彩票app委员会(Texas Real Estate Commission)通过了对第537条的修改.《2021十大正规彩票app》将于5月15日生效. Here’s what the changes mean for you.
When a license holder is negotiating 合同 for the sale, 交换, option, 租赁, or rental of any interest in real property, 他或她必须使用一份强制性的德州2021十大正规彩票app委员会表格(如果有的话). 但也有例外，TREC对其中两个例外进行了修改:
形式 created by a property owner or an attorney. 以前, 许可证持有人可以在交易中使用其他形式，其中合同形式已由交易的委托人准备好，或由律师准备并应交易的委托人要求. The updated rule changes “principal” to “property owner,” which reflects the language in the Real Estate License Act.
Transactions without mandatory TREC 形式 or addenda. 在规则改变之前, 许可证持有人可以在TREC没有颁布标准合同格式的交易中使用其他格式，如果该格式是由持执照的德克萨斯州律师准备并经该律师批准的. Approximately 50 TAR 形式, 例如商业合约-改善物业(TAR 1801)或住宅租约(TAR 2001), exist because of this exception. 更新后的规则要求这样的表单包含某些信息, such as who prepared the form and any restrictions on its use. 在此例外情况下存在的所有TAR表单都已经包含了所需的信息.
An addendum that changes the rights, 义务, 一方在强制性TREC合同或附录表格下的救济措施必须包括附加信息. TAR offers one such form, the 搬迁附录 (含1941). This form will be updated to include the newly required information.
阅读这篇文章的标题让我感到困惑……在我阅读了下面的评论之后. ~Is anyone else having the same issue with the title…? —After reading the explanation of the action that TREC took, it is hard to see where this “limits when a lawyer can draft a contract.” So they changed the wording to say “property owner”, 但这和让律师为业主起草合同有什么关系呢? I did not hear any new restrictions placed on lawyers. Would someone p租赁 tell me what I am missing here…?
同意. 我很困惑.
我也很困惑. After reading several times, 这是否意味着只有业主(而不是买方)可以准备自己的合同或使用由律师准备的合同?
很好的问题!
那么TAR格式呢??
同意! I saw no limitations for attorneys in this article. TAR can you p租赁 explain?
谢谢!
我还有一个问题是关于其他经纪人合同中包含的所有这些表格. Coldwell Banker就是这样一个经纪人，它有自己的表格，要求各方签字. 由于“财产所有人”没有律师草稿，这些表格是否适用于新规则?
我向TREC标准和执法部门提出了类似的问题. Attorney Bill Zukauckas responded, “The amendment to Rule §537.11 makes many changes including the extensive additions to 537.11(a)(4). However, 单次更改为537.11(a)(3)如此明确地用“财产所有人”代替“委托人”，以致毫无疑问，卖方是唯一可以作准备的委托人, or require his or her attorney to prepare, a contract form or an addendum to a contract form. 这也是我的理解，这种财产所有者代替本金是本节特有的(537).11(a)(3)) of the rule only.
I’m an old real estate lawyer. Don’t work much on single family residential deals, and don’t want to. But I stumbled on this website, and I was suprised by the following statement: “However, 单次更改为537.11(a)(3)如此明确地用“财产所有人”代替“委托人”，以致毫无疑问，卖方是唯一可以作准备的委托人, or require his or her attorney to prepare, a contract form or an addendum to a contract form” Really? 假设买方聘请了一位律师，律师2021十大正规彩票app修改TREC合同形式. Imagine the lawyer suggests… 阅读更多»
谢谢你指出这两个小的变化，但无论如何变化. I am p租赁d too that a change to Paragraph 5 has occurred, making that paragraph a “Time is of the essence “ paragraph.
我使用的是一份单页的独家上市协议，这份协议是20年前在我的一位律师朋友的帮助下准备的. 我的所有客户仍然可以接受它，甚至比多页TREC Listing表单更受欢迎. 这是否与新规定中的“合同”属于同一类别?因为它实际上是我的公司与客户之间的合同? 我希望不是!
不是人身攻击, 大卫, 但令我惊讶的是，有执照的代理不知道TREC表格(是强制性的)和TAR表格(是可选的)之间的区别.
Don’t we teach this stuff in basic classes? Don’t we review it in CE courses about 合同?
令人遗憾的是，大多数持有经纪人执照的教师从未真正担任过经纪人. 我的经纪人课程指导老师已经在冠军2021十大正规彩票app学院任教15年了, and has never been the broker of record on a single transaction.
TREC doesn’t have a Listing form or Buyer/Tenant Rep 同意ment. They never have, those are TAR 形式.
在我看来，上市协议(合同)太复杂了，无法缩小到一页. ~I’d sure like to see a copy of that form, so I could understand the logic that was used by the attorney.
Feel free to email a copy to me.
RickDeVoss@Realtor.com
Yes this is taught in the blended (formerly Core)courses, then in CE. 这是基本的.
Rick and Randy- I am still always amazed what I see on this blog! I guess that is why I am still an instructor. 兰迪，你说得对. 今年在TREC法律课上，我们指出TREC和TAR之间的区别. 也许会有帮助.
是的,先生. Being an instructor helps immensely. As they say, “The best way to learn something, is to teach it.”
SO, QUESTION… DOES THIS PERTAIN TO HOUSES THAT ARE SOLD BY OWNER?? i am in a situation where everything is falling apart, 字面上的, on my house and i havent even been in it a year. im trying to figure out a way out of this deal. 请帮忙???????